DISPUTE RESOLUTION COUNCILS IN PAKISTAN: ASSESSING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF AN ALTERNATIVE MECHANISM FOR RESOLVING LOCAL DISPUTES

Abstract

Dispute resolution councils (DRCs) in Pakistan have emerged as a popular and effective mechanism for resolving disputes at the community level. DRCs are composed of local representatives and community leaders who provide a quick and accessible means of dispute resolution for people who may not have access to the formal justice system. This article aims to assess the effectiveness of the DRCs as an alternative mechanism for resolving local disputes in Pakistan. The article will examine the strengths and weaknesses of the DRCs, their impact on access to justice, and the challenges they face. However, despite their popularity, DRCs confront a variety of difficulties and flaws that must be fixed to increase their efficacy and sustainability. These challenges include the lack of trained personnel, inadequate resources, limited public awareness and trust, limited expertise in dealing with complex legal issues, and a need for better coordination with the formal justice system.  To address these challenges, it is recommended that DRCs receive regular training and capacity-building, greater resource allocation, improved public awareness and trust, better integration with the formal justice system, and better monitoring and evaluation mechanisms. By implementing these recommendations, it is possible to improve the effectiveness and sustainability of DRCs in Pakistan and to ensure that they provide accessible, affordable, and reliable justice to the people of Pakistan.